‘The prostitute I met gave me good sex; I wanted more’ – JB Danquah’s accused killer

Asiedu is currently undergoing a jury trial at the Accra High Court, led by Justice Lydia Osei Marfo, in connection with the 8 February 2016 murder of MP Danquah-Adu. Having concluded its case, the prosecution, represented by Principal State Attorney Mrs Sefakor Batse, established that Asiedu must answer the charges. In addition to murder, he faces a robbery charge, though he has been acquitted of conspiring with Vincent Bossu, who has since been freed.

The trial resumed on Monday, 4 November 2024, after extensive delays, largely attributed to a jury strike during the 2023/24 legal year. On this day, Asiedu took the witness box, responding to questions about the MP’s death. Earlier, he had testified about his visit to Konkonsa Bar, where he met a sex worker who later invited him to her residence. Under questioning by his lawyer, Yaw Dankwah, he elaborated that he returned to her home around 4:00 a.m., just two hours after initially leaving.

In court, Asiedu shared, “My lady, whenever I feel like having sex, I usually go to Vienna City in Madina. But the pleasure this lady provided that night made me go back after I went to the beer bar at 2:00 a.m. for more drinks. While drinking, I reflected on our time together and the conversations we shared, which prompted me to return to her.”

Excerpts from Asiedu’s testimony:

Q: You were present in court when the prosecution presented statements allegedly made by you to the police. Do you recall?

Q: Can you explain to the court what you initially told the police?

A: My lady, it was early morning when I went to the police regional headquarters to report an incident involving some individuals where I had gone to seek the services of a sex worker. The person who accompanied me asked me to wait at the counter while he spoke to the station commander. He later returned with the police officer, but I did not proceed with my report as the commander wanted to see me.

Q: The police claim that you provided different accounts—some denying involvement and others implicating others. Can you explain these variations to the jury?

A: Initially, I maintained my innocence, but I was threatened with my life if I did not comply. Under pressure, I agreed to whatever the police said and did as instructed.

Q: Following this threat, were you required to give further statements?

A: Yes, my lady. They instructed me to thumbprint a statement form without allowing me to speak.

Q: The prosecution’s DNA expert testified that a sample matching your DNA was found on a T-shirt in JB Danquah’s house, although the T-shirt was not presented in court. What is your response?

Counsel for the Republic: My lady, for the record, the T-shirt in question was previously admitted as Exhibit E.

Counsel for the Accused: My lady, Exhibit E, was never shown to the accused nor to the jury. We request its availability for examination at the next hearing.

Court: The objection is upheld. Exhibit E will be made available for the defence on the next adjourned date.

Q: You mentioned returning to the woman’s place around 4:00 a.m. after drinking at the bar. What led you to go back?

A: My lady, after experiencing the pleasure she provided, I felt compelled to return.

Q: What were you drinking?

A: ‘Red Bull’ energy drink.

Q: What is the name of the woman?

The case has been adjourned to 6 November 2024.


Source link

About coprian

Check Also

Nsenene more nutritious than chicken

Beyond being a staple, Nsenene have a social and nutritional value. Socially, when being collected …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *